Quality · Change control

Change control

Change control fails in two opposite directions — as a bottleneck the business routes around, or as a signature with no real assessment. Both look like a working process on paper.

In one line

Nothing should be implemented before the assessment that should have preceded it.

One GMP problem. Multiple perspectives.Roles that genuinely see this differently — not the same text with the job title changed.

Change control from five GMP roles

QA

Quality assurance and the system as a whole

Is the assessment genuinely cross-functional?

Quality, validation, equipment qualification, regulatory dossier and quality agreements. The dossier question is the one most often missed.

QC

Laboratory, testing and analytical data

Does this affect a method, specification or stability commitment?

Analytical changes frequently carry dossier implications that are invisible on the shop floor.

Manufacturing

Production, process and the floor

Can routine changes actually move?

If minor changes queue behind the same committee as significant ones, the business will route around the process.

QP

Certification and batch release

Has anything changed that affects the basis for release?

Including changes at contract sites, which should reach you through the quality agreement.

Regulatory

Requirements, dossier and authority expectations

Does this require a variation?

Implementing first and filing later converts a quality process into a regulatory problem.

Related

Reading, services and tools

Next step

Score it rather than estimate it

The GMP Health Index scores seven quality-system domains and maps each to a maturity level. It calculates in your browser and keeps history on your device only.